Deaf Man Given $175,000 Settlement After Oklahoma Troopers Used Excessive Force During Arrest

OKLAHOMA CITY – A man who is deaf has been given a $175,000 settlement after claiming Oklahoma Highway Patrol troopers used excessive force during an arrest.

Pearson was arrested in south Oklahoma City on the night of January 3, 2014.

After the arrest came a firestorm of criticism because Pearson is deaf and he was seriously injured during the ordeal, which was captured on one trooper’s dash camera.

Oklahoma County District Attorney David Prater cleared the troopers of all wrongdoing and charged Pearson with a misdemeanor crime.

Last year, he sat down with Ali Meyer to tell his side of the story, more than three years after the arrest.

Pearson, who is 68 years old now, was headed home from a community deaf group meeting when the OHP tried to pull him over for suspected involvement in a hit-and-run.

The troopers didn’t know he is deaf and non-verbal.

He can communicate with the help of an interpreter.

“You know, they hit me in the face first. After that, I was thrown. I didn’t know why I was handcuffed, and I didn’t know why it was happening,” Pearson said. “After the beating and all that, I tried to communicate (to officers) I need an ambulance. They were like no, no. They were going slow as snails. I was thinking, please, Lord, don’t let me die here. When I finally got to the hospital, I thought I’m safe.”

One of the troopers captured the arrest on dash camera.

Most of the action occurs off-camera, but the audio is critical to understanding what happened.

Prater said he used the video and audio in making legal decisions about the case.

“You have to comply with law enforcement,” Prater said when he made the decision charge Pearson in 2014. “They have to see your hands. That’s what you kill someone with. That’s what you use to punch people. That’s what you use to stab people. That’s what you use to shoot people.”

Troopers reportedly feared Pearson had a weapon.

The video and audio from dash camera confirm a struggle that lasted five and a half minutes.

The arresting officers did not know Pearson was deaf until after he was handcuffed and subdued.

Pearson, his family and his attorney, Scott Adams, fought the charge against him.

They were preparing for trial when the district attorney dropped the case.

Prater dismissed the case citing the cost to taxpayers.

According to the motion filed in district court, the estimated cost to prosecute the case was expected to be very high because of the cost associated with hiring out-of-state interpreters, which a judge ruled was required.

Pearson keeps a placard in his car that reads: “Driver is deaf. Failure to follow verbal commands means I am NOT hearing you.”

It is his first tool for communicating his disability in a situation where there may have been misunderstanding.

He had the placard in his car the night he was arrested, but he didn’t have a chance to show the officers who acted quickly when they pulled him over.

“All I know is I just don’t get why they beat me up like that,” Pearl told News 4 last year. “They looked at me, and they assumed a stereotype that they assume is the case about all people that look like me.”

Pearson filed a civil lawsuit against the OHP and the troopers involved in his arrest, claiming the troopers “used unnecessary, unprovoked and excessive force.”

Earlier this year, a federal judge approved a settlement between the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety and Pearson.

As part of the settlement, Pearson will receive $175,000.

DPS said the settlement is not an admission of liability but made in order to resolve the matter and to avoid the expenses and uncertainties of litigation.

Pearson was also awarded a settlement of $20,000 from Oklahoma County.


If you haven't already, be sure to like our Filming Cops Page on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Please visit our sister site Smokers ONLY

Sign Up To Receive Your Free E-Book
‘Advanced Strategies On Filming Police’

About author

Filming Cops
Filming Cops 5618 posts

Filming Cops was started in 2010 as a conglomerative blogging service documenting police abuse. The aim isn’t to demonize the natural concept of security provision as such, but to highlight specific cases of State-monopolized police brutality that are otherwise ignored by traditional media outlets.

You might also like